yeah, i'm a little disappointed, not so much with the output, cos it's probably user error, but more so with not being able to get this picture into my gallery. it was composed of fifteen shots (though only 12 were used here, original resolution 6352x4864), but glitches in the bottom part (around the REFORMA section) finally did me in, and i won't continue to try and get it to work. i want to post it here, just so that people can see it though, cos it is a pretty cool piece of art, painted by jose clemente orozco, it is a mural covering the domed ceiling at the governor's palace in guadalajara. i do have a picture of one of the other massive murals (not a panorama) that he painted, that i will be posting later, but it doesn't look as good as what this would have. anyway, a couple of questions, if anyone knows the answers, feel free to let me know.
is more control points better or worse? with twelve pictures, i created 663 control points, is that too many, not enough?
and probably more importantly, how important is staying in one position to take all the pictures? i think one of my problems was that i moved around to take some pictures, creating some different angles where the control points might have not matched very well, and had different sizes and shapes of the same sections.
live and learn i guess, hopefully my next panorama turns out a bit better than this one (which would've been pretty sweet had i pulled it off).
#33 dtra (david tran)
looks pretty good... don't think I can answer any of your questions...663 control points sounds like a lot! and moving around definitely wouldn't help. I'm not sure what to do when hugin isn't matching up pics properly... I had the same problem on one of my panoramas and ended up just giving up on it. you should try that program that ozzy had and see what that looks like.
alf
-
7:10 26th-jun-2008
yeah, maybe, i'll have to export as jpegs then run it on my old computer, dunno how that'll work, took an hour or so to export the panorama on my new computer (with 4gb ram!!), they were tiffs though, so maybe that makes a big difference.
dtra
-
19:33 27th-jun-2008
the image looks really good; really appreciate being able to see so detailed.
Wish I could be more helpful on the tech aspects; I think you're right about changing position of the camera causing the problems.
Kim -
13:19 8th-jul-2008